The Minister and the Miss Creant

I am amazed. It seems that popular opinion is taking a righteous stance on the subject of the philandering ways of our Minister of Sport. What does it have to do with any one of us? Nothing. Popular opinion says that he is a public figure and therefore etcetera. Really? Let us not forget that he is a man. Even those men who sit at their computers and expound on how unprincipled he is, I’ll wager have had their fair share of flinging. It’s really a bit of ‘so what’, isn’t it?

In my view, and I know that my view is often not shared, nonetheless, in my view it is very parochial of popular opinion to be making a fuss over a man having consensual sex with a woman, even one to whom he is not married, though he be married. It happens. It has been happening since there were men and women; since Adam and Eve; since Sodom and Gamorrah. People have extramarital sex. It’s not worth a gasp.

Isn’t it a little late in the evolution of human kind for a silly woman to be able to blackmail a man because he had sex with her? Are we really, as a society stuck in those dark ages? He didn’t fall on her unsuspecting body. He didn’t force himself. He was there by invitation. Is she any better? She is not. However, she is not a public figure, so we don’t judge her. Hardly fair, is it?

It is not for me to pass judgement either, but I’d say she is an insult to all honest philandering men and women. And word is that Ms Thang has been something of an ANC bicycle. Fair enough, she can be the bicycle if she so chooses; though I feel it is only right that the bicycle should not reveal by whom she is ridden. It’s too tacky for words. Oops, was that judgement?

One would think that she would have some concern for her reputation. It seems she has none. But then, perhaps a woman’s concern for her reputation is as old fashioned an idea as the idea of fidelity in marriage.

If the Minister were to marry every woman with whom he enjoyed a bit of a buffet would that be more satisfactory to ‘society’? No, because then he would be accused, as our president is frequently accused, of demeaning women; of being backward; of being anachronistic.

Is anyone really as shock-horrored as they pretend to be? I find it very difficult to believe that we are so unsophisticated. Is there some hope of embarrassing the Minister? Is a man ever embarrassed by the fact that he managed to pull a considerably younger woman? I mean among men, doesn’t that make him ‘the man’?

Perhaps one might have some sympathy for the bicycle if she hadn’t demanded money. Oh, tacky, tacky, tacky. There are ugly names for women who use their honey pot to extort money from men. Now if we want to take a moral stance on anything, we should take a moral stance on that.

Some people have said that the Minister is a hypocrite. Are we not all hypocrites who speak out in judgement of him? And are not those who judge loudest the most lacking in perspicacity?


About Tselane Tambo

I share myself in these desultory ramblings. It’s my thoughts and memories; some anecdotes and opinions. It’s an accidental autobiography. When you’ve meandered through these pages you’ll be within reach of a little piece of me. Thank you for dropping by.
This entry was posted in Nocturnal Ramblings of a Mind Unplugged. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Minister and the Miss Creant

  1. kwakhehla says:

    Much ado about noThang. What we should interested in when it comes government representatives (appointed or elected) is whether they can do, and actually do do, the job they were designated to do. Duties and job requirements are about performance of the tasks they are supposed to do, not about performance sans underwear.

    At the same time we don’t want to have to pay for their after-hours ego-boosting antics. They must finance that out of their own pocket (when they can find their trousers).

    Much of this debate, as you rightly point out, has been just good old-fashioned hypocrisy and denialism (our favourite fall-back guys). Self-appointed rabble commentators who started up this whole furore should get a reality check. And newspapers should put salacious gossip firmly where it belongs (in the trash can).

    I want to know what bang I am getting for my tax rand, not who is banging who.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s